You Think You’re Safe Because the Front Door Is Locked? Why Cloud & Backup Security Still Fails
Today, let's talk about "Server-Side Parameter Pollution". What is "Server-Side Parameter Pollution"?
Simply put, some websites have "internal APIs" hidden in their backend that are normally inaccessible from the outside. However, if the website "directly pastes" your input when sending requests to these internal APIs without proper security handling, problems can arise. It's like passing a note to someone without checking if extra lines have been secretly added to it.
In such cases, attackers can exploit vulnerabilities, for example:
- Silently modifying the original parameters;
- Causing the website to behave abnormally;
- Or even accessing data they shouldn't see.
How do you test for this type of vulnerability?
You can try inserting special characters like #, &, = into various input fields—such as after the question mark in a URL, in forms, request headers, or even within the URL path—and then observe if the website reacts abnormally.
For example, suppose there's a website that can search for users. You enter "peter" in the search box, and the browser sends a request like this:
GET /userSearch?name=peter&back=/home
At this point, the website backend will send another request to its internal API:
GET /users/search?name=peter&publicProfile=true
If the website doesn't perform security checks on your input, an attacker could influence or even control that internal request by constructing special input, thereby causing damage.
The challenge in discovering this type of vulnerability lies in how we can quickly and efficiently find parameter names and values that can pollute server requests. This has some similarities with the discovery and exploitation of hidden API parameters discussed earlier. To better distinguish the technical principles and exploitation methods between the two, the following describes their differences:
(1) Server-Side Parameter Pollution (SSPP)
Attack location: You attack request ①, aiming to pollute request ②.
Core principle: The website embeds the value you provide (e.g., name=peter) directly into the parameter value part of the request ② it generates, without security checks. The attacker injects delimiters (&, #) to truncate and add new parameters.
Analogy: You order takeout (request ①: "I want a serving of shredded pork with garlic sauce"). The restaurant owner directly writes your words into the order for the kitchen (request ②), and you write on the takeout order: "shredded pork with garlic sauce & add two extra servings of abalone & make it free". If the kitchen doesn't verify, you might succeed. You are polluting the "order content".
In the previous example:
Your input name=peter is placed directly after name= in the internal request. An SSPP attack would try to add &admin=true after peter, making the internal request become:
GET /users/search?name=peter&admin=true&publicProfile=true
(Attempting to add an administrator parameter)
(2) Discovery and Exploitation of Hidden API Parameters
Attack location: You try to directly guess or discover the structure and parameters of request ②.
Core principle: The internal API itself may have unpublished parameters used to control functionality. Attackers use various methods (such as analyzing frontend JS code, testing common parameter names, and exploiting information leaks) to discover these hidden parameters.
Analogy: You discover that the restaurant's order to the kitchen (request ②) might have "hidden options," like spice level=5, use premium ingredients=true. Although you don't directly modify the order content, you guess the names and usage of these options through various methods, then try to add these commands to your own takeout order (request ①), hoping the restaurant owner will copy them exactly.
In the previous example:
The attacker discovers that the internal API /users/search might accept an unpublished parameter includeSensitiveData=true, besides the known name and publicProfile parameters.
Then they might try in request ①:
GET /userSearch?name=peter&back=/home&includeSensitiveData=true
They hope the website will pass the entire key-value pair includeSensitiveData=true unchanged into internal request ②.
Why “Front Door Security” Is No Longer Enough
Many organizations believe they are secure simply because:
-
Firewalls are enabled
-
VPN access is restricted
-
Admin portals are protected
However, modern attackers rarely use the front door. They target backup systems, management consoles, APIs, and misconfigurations—areas often overlooked by traditional security models.
This false sense of safety is one of the biggest risks in cloud and virtualization environments.
Common “Back Doors” Attackers Exploit
Even well-secured environments often expose hidden attack paths, including:
-
Unprotected backup repositories
-
Weak credentials on management consoles
-
Excessive administrative privileges
-
Missing MFA on backup software
-
Insecure snapshot or replication access
These vulnerabilities allow attackers to bypass perimeter defenses entirely.
Why Backup Systems Are a Prime Target
Attackers increasingly focus on backup infrastructure because:
-
It guarantees leverage during ransomware attacks
-
It often has elevated privileges
-
It’s rarely monitored like production systems
Once backups are compromised, recovery becomes impossible—turning an incident into a disaster.
👉 This makes backup security just as important as production security.
🔹 Backup & Ransomware Defense
VBR Security Feature Deep Dive – Malware & Ransomware Protection
https://anfuitblog.blogspot.com/2025/11/vbr-security-feature-deep-dive-malware.htmlVeeam v13 Malware Detection – Comprehensive Overview
https://anfuitblog.blogspot.com/2025/11/v13-malware-detection-comprehensive.htmlVeeam Intelligence Functions – Smart Backup Automation
https://anfuitblog.blogspot.com/2025/11/veeam-intelligence-function.html
🔹 Risk & Real-World Impact
Top 10 High-Risk Cloud & Virtualization Security Threats
https://anfuitblog.blogspot.com/2026/01/top-10-high-risk-cloudvirtualization.htmlReviewing a Case Where Veeam Backup Failed
https://anfuitblog.blogspot.com/2025/12/reviewing-case-where-veeam-backup.html
🔹 Trusted security references:
CISA – Defense-in-Depth Strategy
https://www.cisa.gov/defense-depthNIST Zero Trust Architecture (SP 800-207)
https://www.nist.gov/publications/zero-trust-architectureVeeam Ransomware Trends Report
https://www.veeam.com/ransomware-trends-report.html
[Article Notice]
- Purpose: This content is created solely for cybersecurity technology research and educational purposes.
- Red Line: Strictly prohibit using the knowledge in this article for any unauthorized illegal activities. Users must comply with relevant laws such as the "Cybersecurity Law."
- Responsibility: Any consequences arising from misuse of the techniques described herein are solely the responsibility of the user and are not associated with this public account or the author.
- Disclaimer: The content is for reference only. The author makes no guarantees regarding its accuracy or completeness.
- Reading this article signifies your agreement to the above terms.
